Skip to main content

You can’t handle social media


The internet was supposed to make us smarter. Google thinks that’s one of Alphabets main jobs, or they advertise themselves as Information Providers anyway. It’s not working. We are either getting righteously naive or socially inept, or both. 
Way back in the early 2000’s, at the peak of my world wide connected optimism about this new democratic, humanitarian, freedom of information age, I taught my toddler how to ‘surf’ and ‘use a mouse’-now that terminology even dates him. On a positive note, he actually did turn out to be really smart. That may be because the chicken came before Google or if you asked the nurses at the hippie hospital he was born in, they would say it was the breastfeeding-but I have proof that’s not it. And that is just it-yes, I said it’s not it, but it is. The amount of misinformation that lingers and spreads, the lies that are let live-it’s not any better with the internet-or smart phones. Proof? Ok, my daughter. As though needed more to be said, still, I will expound slightly. She is a straight A student, a92nd nothing short of a witty confident budding genius. And yes, I know this. She was not breast fed either. She’s trying to learn guitar right now, but You Tube isn’t helping and she wants lessons-with a human.

I used to think smartphones would save relationships, prevent a ton of arguments and in general be little portable pocket purveyors of truth. Again, I was wrong. 
Simply the ability to “look it up” anywhere anytime and see who is ‘right’-and GPS-fah-getta-bout-it!I thought there would be no more arguing over asking for directions like my grandparents used to do. Wrong. My grandparents were also married for 60+ years unlike most marriages today which makes you wonder...

If course people still argue today. I would assert even more so. There is simply more in your face that has a chance of being offensive to someone in some way.   They used to say in radio-if you don’t like it change the channel-but people log into social media every day looking for a good old fight. They may not say they are, and do not accuse them (of anything)-dems fightin’ words, but what fun is a world where everyone agrees? Even on issues like cats versus dogs. Utopia? I think not. Serious folks, social media is a schizophrenics salon, a peeping tom’s paradise and apparently turning into an arguing arena behind anonymous avatars especially. There is just a lack of accountability. And an overwhelming wealth of opinion decorated with links as fact and much too much misinformation.  It reminds me of how much I miss Umberto Eco-or how we need a new version of him to collect and poke through and archive safetly all the digital erroneous information we have amassed in the ‘clouds’.  Just the other day a relative shared that Betty White had passed away. I’d seen that one before-she’s not dead, but my dear gullible kin nearly died of embarrassment. Jumping on guns (or first to share), or erratic ‘Enter’ -ing can be dangerous. That same day, another person I know shared a meme with some ‘fact’ about methane and seaweed farms- asserting that the world could be saved via this simple non-invasive marine methodological ‘science’-hmmpph! Hogwash. People should do their research or not claim to ‘know’ or share poor information. Sure, with the advent of Photoshop we have all slowly turned into skeptics, not to mention how many space trolls are fans of CGI, its underwhelming for intelligence on this planet! We get tricked all the time. We also react too quickly.


Today marks the 15th year since my grandfather, a veteran passed away. We were very close, he was my first death, I lost part of me that I’ve been re-growing ever since.  He and I did not agree on a lot of things. As I grew older we had many debates and long discussions to which I still think about-especially today.  Despite how passionate we were about our opinions, we respected each other first and a difference of opinion second and third, and equally important, we saw these conversations as progress, a chance to see the other side. This respect was once found even on the street everywhere in nearly every age-and not just between loving family members. The ability to have a respectful discourse is a thing of the past. Everyone’s opinion is supported by science-news-research-advertising-wait-where’s truth? Perhaps that’s seeping through the hole in the ozone.  Honestly, citizen scientists and professed ‘ecologists’ are opinionologists and moralologists who look in only one direction, the one that supports what they wish to find or show. Following science, taking in validated information, enjoying the liberal wealth of good writing, photography, art, and celebrating humanity are wonderful benefits of the most innovative internet tool mankind has put together yet. My grandfather would be in awe but likewise used to say, “A tool is only as good as the hands that use it”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What you may not know about Rochambeau

It is a lingua franca, or a universal game, dating back to the Han dynasty of China (206 BC-220 AD), simply called shoushilling (trans. ‘hand command’) and nearly two thousand years later we still play this simple game, called by various names all over the globe.  English speakers call it Roshambo (technically Rochambeau) or “rock-paper-scissors”, “ick-ack-ock”, or even “ching-chang-walla” and is most often played between 2 people in a decision-making challenge, much like drawing straws or plucking daisy petals, but requires no props real props.  While it was introduced to Europeans as late as the 1920’s for its portability and simple instructions, quickly gained popularity for its considered “uncheatable” fairness. In the 1930’s Rochambeau was promoted widely in America, more specifically aimed towards school-age children that could take this game with them where-ever they may be and use it to settle trivial disputes (thereby freeing up the parents/adults need to inter...

Making sense up as I go

Side effects can be good. New data that science has been acquiring and collecting about the brain itself has provided an over-stimulating amount of data to condense usable information from. How much we don’t know about the brain is not only ironic, it's borderline tragic. I keep my eyes and ears on new studies published. Reading knowledgeable interpretations of information about the brain are much easier to chew on. I am hopeful the number of senses will be revised, upgrading our generation to Human version 2.0, but minimally I am hoping for an official promotion of ‘intuition’ as a new addition the team of five sense staples. I realize these chances are about as likely as Pluto getting an official reinstatement, and it’s at least as many miles away from sociological acceptance in the mainstream. Why intuition as our sixth sense? I’m not talking about ESP, or anything metaphysical (maybe hyper-real at most), but every human knows what this (intuition) is, every culture, all t...

One of a kind of...

I do not have a problem with being unique, or should I say not being unique. I mean, I suspect beyond a hunch that I am exactly like many people-most people even-but not all people in more than a handful of ways. I like the uniqueness of others. I am not unique though. I am like many people that are as just different as I am. “I think there’s just one kind of folks. Folks.” Harper Lee Americans love sugar, we even coat our fondest words with it. And fat, we love to chew our fat too. It seems most of us will eat whatever is placed in front of us. I lived in Texas briefly and many, many men (and a few women) called me ‘Sugar’ or ‘Hon’ or ‘Doll’, I only took personal offense with ‘Sugar’ and actually adopted the habit of saying ‘Hon’. Not many people say ‘Hon’ in California, I guess that’s different. Californians don’t actually say ‘DUDE’, not all Californians are actors, athletes, hippies or hobos although we do have these citizens. Most Californians say, ‘it’s all good’ or ‘no wor...